View Single Post
Old 03-02-2009, 11:30 PM   #30
NatCh
Gizmologist
NatCh ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.NatCh ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.NatCh ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.NatCh ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.NatCh ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.NatCh ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.NatCh ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.NatCh ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.NatCh ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.NatCh ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.NatCh ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
NatCh's Avatar
 
Posts: 11,615
Karma: 929550
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Republic of Texas Embassy at Jackson, TN
Device: Pocketbook Touch HD3
Quote:
Originally Posted by cmbs View Post
Deety - Thank you for being open minded. My original post was simply a set of questions meant for anyone open minded who felt like answering. If anyone did. Assess the sites for yourself, make your own decisions. Answer my comments if you want to, they speak for themselves.

Nat - I didn't tell you to remove any links. I didn't suggest that any links should be removed. I wasn't talking to you (ie: any mobile read mods). My questions were questions, hopefully to be responded to by open minded visitors who are more capable of actually understanding my comments for what they are. Or not, as they saw fit. I'm not surprised it got attacked, that's usually how you all respond to anything I say. I'm more surprised I bothered to respond to you. There's really no point, after all.
Attacked? What part was the attack? When I said that you had a good point?

When I took the trouble to look at each of the links you were asking questions about and explain why I thought they were okay?

When I asked people to report links they thought might be questionable so that they could be dealt with appropriately?

Or was it when I suggested that the tone of your questions might be misconstrued by the oversensitive?


Forgive me, but you really seemed to be implying pretty strongly in your responses that there was something objectionable on one or more of the linked sites. If I misunderstood that, I apologize, but it really did sound like that was what you were saying.

You also really seemed to be accusing me, personally, of deliberately ignoring whatever it was you seemed to be hinting at.

All I've done is to ask you what it was you found objectionable so that I could deal with it -- after all that's the sort of thing moderators are supposed to do, that's part of why we read the forums.
NatCh is offline   Reply With Quote