View Single Post
Old 10-28-2018, 07:13 PM   #447
davidfor
Grand Sorcerer
davidfor ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.davidfor ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.davidfor ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.davidfor ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.davidfor ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.davidfor ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.davidfor ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.davidfor ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.davidfor ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.davidfor ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.davidfor ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Posts: 24,905
Karma: 47303824
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Sydney, Australia
Device: Kobo:Touch,Glo, AuraH2O, GloHD,AuraONE, ClaraHD, Libra H2O; tolinoepos
Quote:
Originally Posted by dunhill View Post
For that reason I saw differences in the qualifications, also the qualification with decimals is varying according to the votes of the users.
Sorry, I have no idea what you mean here. I don't know what "qualifications" you are referring to. And for the number of people rating, the only affect I can think of is that the more times it has been rated, the less likely the rating will be an integer. It shouldn't have an affect on whether the rating is retrieved by the plugin or not. Overall, I can't tell if you are saying there is a problem, or telling me you now understand what is happening and hence it isn't a problem.

A recommendation for anyone reporting problems with any of the metadata source plugins is to give an actual example. Include the link to the book that you are having problems with and explain clearly what the problem is. Or what change in behaviour is wanted. And the more details the better. The most useful piece of information is usually the thing where the problem reporter thought, "They won't need to know that."
davidfor is offline   Reply With Quote