Thread: Ages old debate of reading vs. listening to books
View Single Post
Old 10-14-2018, 08:32 AM   #85
sealbeater
Banned
sealbeater ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.sealbeater ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.sealbeater ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.sealbeater ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.sealbeater ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.sealbeater ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.sealbeater ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.sealbeater ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.sealbeater ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.sealbeater ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.sealbeater ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Posts: 666
Karma: 1752814
Join Date: Jan 2008
Device: Sony Reader PRS-505 : Onyx Boox Max : Sony PRS-900 : Onyx Kepler Pro
Quote:
Originally Posted by DiapDealer View Post
Your guess is wrong. I don't care for audiobooks, myself. I just don't presume that my preference is the "correct" one. But i thank you for the gift of your response. It serves to disprove your own assumptions quite nicely. Case in point: you--who only "read" and prefer it not be used to describe any other activity (and believe more "listening" would naturally result in less literacy and more homonym misuse)--have used the word "interperting."
Really...a spelling mistake? At 5:31 AM my time? What a joke.

Correction: 4:37 AM.

EDIT: I can type fast and misspell a word but I've never confused to, too and two.
Last edited by sealbeater; 10-14-2018 at 08:39 AM.
sealbeater is offline   Reply With Quote