Thread: Review 9-6-2006
View Single Post
Old 09-08-2006, 03:31 PM   #48
pitcher23
Zealot
pitcher23 began at the beginning.
 
pitcher23's Avatar
 
Posts: 138
Karma: 12
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: New York USA
Quote:
Originally Posted by ali
You repeatedly make fun of her being "tech-savvy" (I'm sure she is, btw). You fail to show that what she writes is wrong, you just find mere minor inaccuracies, and hence you make fun of her. Bad style, dude. Rude.
I'm sorry, but what she wrote was not a minor inaccuracy. It was a flat out significant mistake. Her saying that if the device runs out of power it becomes irrevocably damaged could not be more wrong and should not be glossed over as a writers style. I know I f I were the average customer reading that review I would steer the hell clear of a product like that. It's like a person writing a review on hairdryers saying that "the dryer will electrocute you when plugged in", but forgetting to add "if you drop it in the tub while you bathe".

A person who is taking the time to write a review of a product, who incidently wrote that no paper documentation, save the 5 x 7 sheet that came int he box, should at least read that one page through before posting such an egregious error.


Quote:
Originally Posted by ali
Some people have jobs, or a life. Read every forum to be found on the net? If I'd do that for every device I have to buy in my job, I'd probably been fired. No, "read everything" naturally has limitations, which are different for different people.
Come on now. That's a cop out. One does not need to do research in one day on a product they would like to buy. If you could spare a half an hour, you would find an awful lot about any product. Incidently if one goes to google and enters Irex Iliad, A mobileread topic will be third on the list. If the reviewer was serious about researching, she would have found Mobileread in about a half a second.

Last edited by pitcher23; 09-08-2006 at 06:24 PM.
pitcher23 is offline   Reply With Quote