View Single Post
Old 09-08-2006, 10:48 AM   #31
Xenophon
curmudgeon
Xenophon ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Xenophon ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Xenophon ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Xenophon ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Xenophon ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Xenophon ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Xenophon ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Xenophon ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Xenophon ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Xenophon ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Xenophon ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Xenophon's Avatar
 
Posts: 1,487
Karma: 5748190
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Redwood City, CA USA
Device: Kobo Aura HD, (ex)nook, (ex)PRS-700, (ex)PRS-500
Jorgen wrote:
Quote:
I have seen languages that promised to be the last relevant: Ada, Eiffel, C++, Java, C## and what do you know: the only language that is forever is good old C.
I'm not sure about the other languages on your list, but I can say with some confidence that the designers of Ada did not claim that it would be the last relevant language -- and James Gosling certainly doesn't make that claim for Java, either. As for languages being "forever," the last study I saw seemed to say that C and Java are only just now catching up with COBOL and Fortran in number of lines of code in fielded (and still maintained) systems. C isn't forever (yet, at least), when compared to COBOL or Fortran.

Xenophon

[obligatory on-topic coment]
Is
there an OpenReader program in the works for any of the eInk readers? NatCh is quite correct to focus on that important question...
[/obligatory on-topic coment]
Xenophon is offline   Reply With Quote