Thread: Cover switching
View Single Post
Old 09-13-2018, 07:44 PM   #22
DNSB
Bibliophagist
DNSB ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DNSB ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DNSB ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DNSB ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DNSB ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DNSB ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DNSB ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DNSB ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DNSB ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DNSB ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DNSB ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
DNSB's Avatar
 
Posts: 47,239
Karma: 171291590
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Vancouver
Device: Kobo Sage, Libra Colour, Lenovo M8 FHD, Paperwhite 4, Tolino epos
Quote:
Originally Posted by theducks View Post
VHS tape (I owned a LaserDisc long before I bit the bullet to get VHS for films not available on the Big Shiny).

Compact Cassette. Even 8-track had better (frequency response) sound.
To me it depends on when you compared 8 track vs compact cassette.

Early 70's: 8 track had slightly better high frequency. It also had the thunk in the middle of a song as you switched tracks. Sonicus interruptus as my then girlfriend referred to it.

Late 70's on: Compact cassette was the hands down winner. The improved tape formulations and Dolby NR made it no contest.

Given that I listened to both in the early 70's in cars where the ambient noise made any claims to fidelity risible while I listened to compact cassettes from the late 70's on at home and in the car.

Then there is the memory of shopping for a portable compact cassette player at J. C. Penney's that was considered one the best for use with the Tarbell tape interface.
DNSB is offline   Reply With Quote