Thread: A blast from the past: Why B&N was supposed to kill Amazon
View Single Post
Old 09-05-2018, 09:13 PM   #42
AnemicOak
Bookaholic
AnemicOak ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.AnemicOak ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.AnemicOak ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.AnemicOak ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.AnemicOak ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.AnemicOak ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.AnemicOak ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.AnemicOak ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.AnemicOak ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.AnemicOak ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.AnemicOak ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
AnemicOak's Avatar
 
Posts: 14,391
Karma: 54969924
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Minnesota
Device: iPad Mini 4, AuraHD, iPhone XR +
Quote:
Originally Posted by ZodWallop View Post
That surprises me. Kindle has more indies, for sure. But any book B&N would sell in their store *should* have been available online. B&N, Kobo and Amazon always seemed to be pretty evenly matched when it came to Big 5 books you could pick up in your average book store.
Big 5, probably, but when I checked last (been a while) there was all kinds of non-fiction stuff from University presses and specialty publishers available at Amazon & not B&N.
AnemicOak is offline   Reply With Quote