View Single Post
Old 09-03-2018, 04:28 PM   #7
dwig
Wizard
dwig ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.dwig ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.dwig ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.dwig ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.dwig ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.dwig ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.dwig ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.dwig ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.dwig ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.dwig ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.dwig ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
dwig's Avatar
 
Posts: 1,613
Karma: 6718541
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Paradise (Key West, FL)
Device: Current:Surface Go & Kindle 3 - Retired: DellV8p, Clie UX50, ...
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rumpelteazer View Post
...
In fluorescent tube they had a coding (at least in the Netherlands) that did not only give the kelvins but also the quality of light: 827 is 2700k in quality 8, 840 is a good quality cool white, but 640 is a lower quality 4000k, with a bluish tint to it. You also have the daylight tubes, which are quality 9; 950, 960, etc, but because of the quality of light they give 30% less light than the quality 8 tubes.
...
The "standard" for the quality value is the Color Rendering Index (CRI), which in North America is normally listed as a 2-digit number. the CRI represents the percentage accuracy of the light source compared to a Black Body Radiator of the same Kelvin temp. The Euro style quality numbering seems to parallel CRI rounded to a single digit (e.g. Quality 8 ~= CRI 80).

For normal use, a CRI of 80 or greater is fine. For color matching or color photography, a CRI of 90 is considered a minimum.
dwig is offline   Reply With Quote