View Single Post
Old 09-01-2018, 03:58 PM   #121
anacreon
Guru
anacreon ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.anacreon ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.anacreon ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.anacreon ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.anacreon ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.anacreon ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.anacreon ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.anacreon ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.anacreon ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.anacreon ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.anacreon ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
anacreon's Avatar
 
Posts: 978
Karma: 3475832
Join Date: May 2012
Location: France
Device: Elipsa, Sage, Libra 2
Quote:
Originally Posted by davidfor View Post
Sorry, based on this post, I have no idea what your original problem was. If you are running the metadata update with those options, then you are explicitly setting the date used in the "Date Added" sort to the date the book was added to calibre. The text in the synopsis is just text and is not used in the sort.

If you are using the "Recent" sort, then this a based on the last read date and the date added. Recent firmware uses whichever of these is the latest as the value in the sort.
I have been using the "Recent" sort, and before the 4.9.11311 F/W, it used the latest between last read date and date added to the device, while now it uses the latest between last read date and date added to Calibre.

I have not modified the metadata parameters, so it looks like this F/W acts differently than previous F/Ws for this. This is what I was commenting on. Incidentally, I would prefer the previous sort, though I still want the "added to Calibre" info in the metadata.
anacreon is offline   Reply With Quote