Quote:
Originally Posted by rcentros
Yes, professionals should be better, but that's not always the case. The reason some (probably many) professionals are in the profession is because Daddy wanted Jr. to follow in his footsteps. But my point is, just because someone is a professional it doesn't follow that he's competent in his profession. A lot people are intimidated by lawyers simply because they are lawyers. They shouldn't be.
|
So, coming back to the topic at hand. In your opinion the law firm representing Parneros does not have good and competent lawyers based on the usage of juvenile language? Or is using multiple lawyers a sign of weakness when one "good and competent" lawyer would suffice? How much knowledge of other defamation cases do you have that makes this one stick out as doomed to fail / unprofessional?
And here is the number one reason why B&N is scared they might actually lose: their response is equally below the waist line by downplaying it as a cheap shot to try extort money. It hit a nerve.