View Single Post
Old 02-28-2009, 11:12 PM   #22
daffy4u
I'm Super Kindle-icious
daffy4u ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.daffy4u ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.daffy4u ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.daffy4u ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.daffy4u ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.daffy4u ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.daffy4u ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.daffy4u ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.daffy4u ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.daffy4u ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.daffy4u ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
daffy4u's Avatar
 
Posts: 6,734
Karma: 2434103
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Long Drive, Calinadia Candafornia
Device: KDXG, KT, Oasis
Quote:
Originally Posted by nelamvr6 View Post
I know a few guys who are into digital art and photography, scanners can be "calibrated" just like monitors and printers. Getting colors to match standards is something they spend a lot of time fussing over.

I think you've done a great thing here, but in my mind any differences color wise between the two Kindles probably fall withing the inherent uncertainty of the scanner used.

I mean, only a slight difference in the way the K1 or K2 was laying on your scanner could have a fairly significant impact on the perceived color of the background or the text.
I believe you. I actually made 2 scans. In each one I switched the positions of the Kindles. Unfortunately in the version where the K1 would have been on the left, my scanner split the Kindles into 2 scan flies instead of 1 (one Kindle in each scan). I didn't even know it could do that.

So my scanner could have more influence than I thought but I also think it is still representative, based the on complaints and/or comments I've been reading.
daffy4u is offline   Reply With Quote