Quote:
Originally Posted by Hitch
Unfreakingbelievable, really. I hope that your lawyer does a chronology, for this judge. In my past life, when I spent time in this line of work, giving Judges factual chronologies of events, as exhibits always seems to help them, particularly when you are hashing and rehashing the same stuff over and over, for no good reason, and there have been other rulings that help point him/her in the desired direction.
Well, keep us posted!
Hitch
|
We've already made a chronology for the previous court case (the one my uncle is now appealing to), so this judge has got it.
One of the things in that letter is that it says a precedent has already been set by another case. A family friend, who studied law, has read that case and says it doesn't apply because there are several important differences in comparison to our case. So we'll have to inform our lawyer of this when she gets back from vacation.
There are a couple of other weird, very un-lawyer-like things in the letter. For instance he writes that you can put anything in an agreement you like. For instance: that what is agreed to is only valid if it rains tomorrow. Yes, he wrote that and it's just plain weird to me. This is to justify my uncle's unreasonable demands in the past. And a couple of other things.
We'll have to wait and see what our lawyer says about it next week.