* Yeah, a scaled down version of the same glyphs would do just fine for the lowercase stuff

.
* See the attached snapshot

. I get the idea, but (some of) the digits are a bit all over the place (mostly 1, 2 & 3).
I'm considering the lack of padding a feature and not a bug ^^. Might be worth experimenting with a tiny bit of padding for the lowercase stuff, though? But I don't really have a strong opinion on that one

.
* Yeah, there's a lot of really tiny BDF/PCF fonts (f.g., creep is 4xsomething, IIRC). Unfortunately, I can only use stuff with a *width* that matches the width of a C data type in bits (i.e., 8/16/32/64). If there's one column of difference one way or the other, than can usually be fudged w/ gbdfed, but even then, turns out that severely limits our possibilities

.
(Plus, in our case, 8x8 is already mind-boggingly tiny on a >250dpi screen ;p)