08-09-2018, 12:35 AM
|
#48
|
Bibliophagist
Posts: 46,922
Karma: 169810634
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Vancouver
Device: Kobo Sage, Libra Colour, Lenovo M8 FHD, Paperwhite 4, Tolino epos
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by DuckieTigger
You act surprised that there is dreck among traditionally published books. News flash: There is a lot of bad books traditionally published, not only Indie, Inc. is guilty of that. What I see there is definitely not worms that ruin the book. The writing of the book itself is what makes this one so bad, not the formatting, IMHO.
|
Sturgeon's revelation?
" I repeat Sturgeon's Revelation, which was wrung out of me after twenty years of wearying defense of science fiction against attacks of people who used the worst examples of the field for ammunition, and whose conclusion was that ninety percent of SF is crud. Using the same standards that categorize 90% of science fiction as trash, crud, or crap, it can be argued that 90% of film, literature, consumer goods, etc. is crap. In other words, the claim (or fact) that 90% of science fiction is crap is ultimately uninformative, because science fiction conforms to the same trends of quality as all other artforms." -- Theodore Sturgeon
|
|
|