|
I did read the dissent. I do wonder if you have read the majority, which by the way represents the actual decision of the Court. The majority comprehensively addresses and debunks the dissent.
What you attempted to imply is essentially that because not all titles are discounted and competitors tend to match prices that there is no competition on price or at least that it is not important. What happened to prices after agency is a good indication of the actual effect price competition was having.
Are you claiming that agency did not in fact lead to increased prices?
|