Quote:
Originally Posted by darryl
@pwalker8. The existence of the price competition which you seem to claim didn't exist seems to me to be amply demonstrated by what happened when it was in fact removed by the price-fixing conspirators. Here is another passage from that inconvenient Court of Appeal decision:
|
Nice straw man you are whacking. What I am said is that the prices for most specific titles didn't vary much between the various book sellers. Many people have pointed out that the prosecutor's "expert" cherry picked titles to make it seem that prices varied a lot more than they did. Please do a little bit of research and try reading both sides of the argument, not just the side that you support. If you want to talk about the inconvenient Court of Appeal decision, at least try reading Jacobs dissent opinion as well, it was a 2-1 decision.
It's real obvious when someone forms an opinion and then goes and looks for evidence to support that opinion, rather than study a situation and read arguments from both sides.