You wouldn't want to do that. The definition for "din" should include what "ditt" is. A normal (paper) dictionary would not show 2 definitions when looking up "ditt". It would have a hyperlink (either literal in electronic, or "see din(1)" in paper)
Or rather, you should not expect your Kindle to show different definitions at once, unless there is multiple meanings for "din".
Last edited by DuckieTigger; 07-18-2018 at 08:52 PM.
|