View Single Post
Old 07-05-2018, 01:03 PM   #11
crich70
Grand Sorcerer
crich70 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.crich70 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.crich70 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.crich70 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.crich70 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.crich70 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.crich70 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.crich70 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.crich70 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.crich70 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.crich70 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
crich70's Avatar
 
Posts: 11,310
Karma: 43993832
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Monroe Wisconsin
Device: K3, Kindle Paperwhite, Calibre, and Mobipocket for Pc (netbook)
There are problems when you translate a book into a movie. For example every page of script = 1 minute of screen time so if you tried to put everything in say "Gone With The Wind" the book into a movie version you would have a very long movie. Also a large part of books is description which you don't need to give in a movie since you see it.

I think the reason that "I Robot" the movie didn't do better is that the book is actually a series of short stories rather than a continual storyline. Will Smith's character was an original idea that was supposed to tie things together but was a bit thin. The character of Viki was based on an element of one of the later stories near the end of the book and was a bit of a gimmick. One character (played by James Cromwell) died in the movie but didn't in the book. It was a fun movie in its way but didn't really gel properly I don't think. Maybe if they had based the movie on Dr. Calvin's experiences over time, aging the character from a young woman, through middle age, and then to old age along the way it would have worked better.
crich70 is offline   Reply With Quote