View Single Post
Old 06-23-2018, 04:52 PM   #44
DuckieTigger
Wizard
DuckieTigger ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DuckieTigger ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DuckieTigger ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DuckieTigger ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DuckieTigger ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DuckieTigger ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DuckieTigger ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DuckieTigger ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DuckieTigger ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DuckieTigger ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DuckieTigger ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
DuckieTigger's Avatar
 
Posts: 4,763
Karma: 246906703
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: USA
Device: Oasis 3, Oasis 2, PW3, PW1, KT
Quote:
Originally Posted by pwalker8 View Post
This week, in the US, the Supreme Court ruled that states and cities can charge sales taxes on items purchased from vendors who do not have a physical presence in that state or city. It's going to make like tough on a lot of small mom and pop stores that sale items on line. It's not going to effect Amazon much.
It doesn't effect Amazon much at all since they mostly already collect the sale tax as they have physical locations in nearly every state. Small Mom & Pop? Depends on the exceptions each state may impose.

From: https://amp.usatoday.com/amp/699556002
Quote:
The ruling only directly affected South Dakota, which had sought to collect taxes from online retailers with more than $100,000 in annual sales or 200 transactions in the state.
DuckieTigger is offline   Reply With Quote