View Single Post
Old 05-16-2018, 01:36 PM   #25
DuckieTigger
Wizard
DuckieTigger ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DuckieTigger ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DuckieTigger ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DuckieTigger ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DuckieTigger ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DuckieTigger ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DuckieTigger ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DuckieTigger ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DuckieTigger ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DuckieTigger ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DuckieTigger ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
DuckieTigger's Avatar
 
Posts: 4,764
Karma: 246906703
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: USA
Device: Oasis 3, Oasis 2, PW3, PW1, KT
Quote:
Originally Posted by j.p.s View Post
That is exactly it. GPL violators have tried in court to use contract law to weasel out of their obligations and they have failed. Copyright law forbids copying without a license and the GPL is carefully crafted to protect the rights of software users. A license under GPL is automatically granted by abiding its terms and automatically denied or revoked by violating them.
Yes, but actually last precedent is that it is a contract issue and not a copyright issue, no matter if GNU wants to call it a copyright license or not.

See: http://www.theregister.co.uk/AMP/201...able_contract/
DuckieTigger is offline   Reply With Quote