I was speaking merely about common courtesy. But ....
Quote:
|
The GPL3 license that DeDRM uses requires that the license itself be included in distribution, but does not require greater attribution of work to end users. So long as Epubor includes the license file, and adhere to the license, they would be in compliance.
|
Except for the part where they don't include—or at the very least provide a way for the user to easily acquire—the source code for the GPL'ed portions. And let's face it: for all practical purposes, including the source code (or making it readily available)
IS attribution. So in essence, adhering to the license DOES require attribution (since the source code in question contains the names, and/or
noms de plume of its creators).