View Single Post
Old 05-06-2018, 01:30 PM   #111
BookCat
C L J
BookCat ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.BookCat ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.BookCat ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.BookCat ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.BookCat ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.BookCat ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.BookCat ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.BookCat ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.BookCat ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.BookCat ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.BookCat ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
BookCat's Avatar
 
Posts: 2,911
Karma: 21115458
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Birmingham UK
Device: Sony e-reader 505, Kindle PW2, Kindle PW3, Kobo Libra2
I'm a very visual person and philosophy was one of the courses I had to take way back in my first year at uni. This was a long time ago (I graduated in 1980), but I remember that course having some of the most difficult reading I've ever encountered. With most of it, I just read it and hoped that something would click. However, I understood the tutorials. If anyone has read Gulliver's Travels and remembers the silly factions disputing trivial things, that's what I would picture during the tutorials. I imagined old men with white beards (philosophers) arguing and dividing into groups of thought, each convinced that they were right.

On the whole, though, I think this type of writing uses a different part of the brain, maybe the left hemisphere, from fiction and visualisation which perhaps uses the right hemisphere.
BookCat is offline   Reply With Quote