Quote:
Originally Posted by mdp
The real calculation should have been:
(271 x 203) / (203 x 139) ~= 1.95.
|
Agreed.
With a more precise calculation assuming the resolution translates to the actual dimensions, I am getting (10.64" x 7.98")/(7.99" x 5.49") ~=1.93.
Regardless, the screen advantage is huge. I am surprised that e-ink is still manufacturing 9.7" screens at that resolution while every other screen size (except budget 6" and smaller screens) comes with a better resolution.