View Single Post
Old 04-19-2018, 06:49 AM   #78
rcentros
eReader Wrangler
rcentros ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.rcentros ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.rcentros ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.rcentros ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.rcentros ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.rcentros ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.rcentros ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.rcentros ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.rcentros ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.rcentros ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.rcentros ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
rcentros's Avatar
 
Posts: 7,915
Karma: 52566355
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Boise, ID
Device: PB HD3, GL3, Voyage
Quote:
Originally Posted by DNSB View Post
The hoot about this was that the test group were audiophiles. When they knew what they were listening to, they could "hear" the differences. When they didn't know what they were listening to, their choices were very different. The same crowd that believed running a green marker around the edges of a CD would reduce the sonic imperfections caused by light reflecting between the layers of the CD.
I'm not an audiophile, but I definitely could tell the difference in some music (I say "could" because I haven't tested this in a while and my ears aren't what they once were). It only makes sense, digital music is going to be "cleaner" or "sharper" (otherwise, what's the point?) -- the "analog" stylus on the vinyl has to introduce some of kind of difference. There's no way it can't. I'm guessing that "difference" (probably imperfections) is what makes some music seem "richer" to listeners.
rcentros is offline   Reply With Quote