View Single Post
Old 04-19-2018, 01:18 AM   #77
DNSB
Bibliophagist
DNSB ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DNSB ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DNSB ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DNSB ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DNSB ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DNSB ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DNSB ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DNSB ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DNSB ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DNSB ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DNSB ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
DNSB's Avatar
 
Posts: 46,864
Karma: 169714736
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Vancouver
Device: Kobo Sage, Libra Colour, Lenovo M8 FHD, Paperwhite 4, Tolino epos
Quote:
Originally Posted by rcentros View Post
Not all people (or their hearing) is the same. I would imagine to make such a blind test "valid" you would have to have a group of audiophiles, not folks chosen randomly.
The hoot about this was that the test group were audiophiles. When they knew what they were listening to, they could "hear" the differences. When they didn't know what they were listening to, their choices were very different. The same crowd that believed running a green marker around the edges of a CD would reduce the sonic imperfections caused by light reflecting between the layers of the CD.
DNSB is offline   Reply With Quote