Quote:
Originally Posted by Pulpmeister
In my view, Amazon failing to identify the exact term or condition breached, when and how, is totally unacceptable. It would be like being arrested, and convicted, without ever finding out your offence. Kakfa springs to mind. Or, more appropriately, "unconscionable", which has a legal meaning.
Which is why innocent cancellations can't be ignored, specially by those affected.
Disclaimer: My only link to Amazon is I own a Kindle, bought through a local non-Amazon computerl retailer, not from Amazon directly.
|
I suspect Amazon doesn't want to spell out what its algorithms are looking for because they don't want to give the true scammers the information they need to find a workaround.
I do think Amazon should have to split their digital services out - maybe even to a read-only access, no more sales - when they close a user's account for suspected misuse of their physical returns policy.