View Single Post
Old 03-22-2018, 01:45 PM   #17
Ruskie_it
Fanatic
Ruskie_it ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Ruskie_it ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Ruskie_it ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Ruskie_it ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Ruskie_it ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Ruskie_it ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Ruskie_it ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Ruskie_it ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Ruskie_it ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Ruskie_it ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Ruskie_it ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Posts: 538
Karma: 1000000
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Rome, Italy
Device: Kindle PW5, Kindle PW4, Kindle 4 NT
Quote:
Originally Posted by kovidgoyal View Post
Series names are interpreted for sorting according to book language. That is the correct, intended behavior. If you dont understand why, look up how sorting rules vary across languages.

If you have a single series with books in multiple languages, set the first language for all the books to be the same, then all the books in that series will sort as you expect.
But then I would be putting wrong data into metadata for single books.
If I have two books in italian and the third in english (I actually have, for a series), and I put into metadata for this third book that it is in "Italian, English"... Then I would be saying that the book is in italian, while it isn't. It would show up in searches I do for books in italian, and that is wrong.

I understand that this is not a bug but the intended behaviour - Teriza's suggestion already made it clear. But it doesn't feel "correct" to me from the logical point of view.
If books are considered to be in the same series (and they are, for calibre shows them all together), then they should have the same series sorting because... again, the series is the same.

I understand that it is tricky to decide which rules to follow; a workaround would be to let the user customize it like you do with the author_sort field; and yes, I understand that it is also hard to introduce the series_sort field into the code now... fine.
But I think the way this subject is handled is not completely right.
Ruskie_it is offline   Reply With Quote