View Single Post
Old 03-07-2018, 07:03 PM   #89
AnotherCat
....
AnotherCat ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.AnotherCat ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.AnotherCat ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.AnotherCat ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.AnotherCat ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.AnotherCat ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.AnotherCat ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.AnotherCat ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.AnotherCat ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.AnotherCat ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.AnotherCat ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Posts: 1,547
Karma: 18068960
Join Date: May 2012
Device: ....
Quote:
Originally Posted by Robotech_Master View Post
According to Wikipedia, 47 out of the 50 US states have adopted the Uniform Enforcement of Foreign Judgments Act.
You don't get it. I specifically asked:

"As far as I am aware the USA is not a signatory to any convention or treaty requiring recognition or enforcement of any other country's courts' judgements except in some cases of international arbitration (which is not the case in the PG matter)."

I am not in the USA so I invited and would welcome any clarification of that by pointing at any relevant USA legislation implementing any such convention or treaty...


Where is the convention or treaty that has been signed? States or Federal can choose to act on foreign judgements or not, they are not bound by international agreement (unless, someone can turn up the signed convention/treaty/? and enacting legislation, which you have not done.)

Last edited by AnotherCat; 03-07-2018 at 07:05 PM.
AnotherCat is offline   Reply With Quote