Quote:
Originally Posted by DNSB
Nah, you're not unreal. From mathematics, if you are not real, you are imaginary.  Or if you are complex (have a nontrivial imaginary part), you can be nonreal.
|
No, no, you have it incorrect. Going to the mathematics for interpretations can lead to misunderstanding.
For example, I am a transcendental reader (i.e. my reading is of transcendent quality, so surpassing and excelling in my reading and choice of reading devices). But I am certainly not something that is just incapable of being produced in a finite number of algebraical operations as a misguided mathematical interpretation might lead one to - of course, if we were talking about calculators rather than reading devices such a comparison might be valid in my case.