View Single Post
Old 03-01-2018, 11:57 PM   #14
darryl
Wizard
darryl ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.darryl ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.darryl ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.darryl ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.darryl ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.darryl ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.darryl ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.darryl ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.darryl ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.darryl ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.darryl ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
darryl's Avatar
 
Posts: 3,108
Karma: 60231510
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Australia
Device: Kobo Aura H2O, Kindle Oasis, Huwei Ascend Mate 7
Quote:
Originally Posted by fjtorres View Post
I wouldn't expect an Amazon-controlled publisher to be the first to abandon Agency. Not as long as the others give it free antitrust cover.
I agree. I fell into the trap of lazily using "agency" to encompass the practice of setting ebook prices high so as to protect print sales. I think you are correct. Agency itself will likely remain, though I do expect that Amazon will price so as to maximise overall ebook sales revenue, rather than per unit margin. As you say, "Amazon isn't proud, they'll make money wherever they can." I don't think its likely that they would adopt the Big 5 practice of setting ebook prices high to favour print. This would indeed place pressure on the other players.

I think S&S would fit beautifully into Amazon, though I'm afraid I don't see Caroline Reidy as an Amazon executive! On reflection I also agree with you about Hachette. The French would probably see an Amazon acquisition as being a cultural disaster of epic proportions. With PRH 75% owned by Bertelsmann last I heard, HC part of News and McMillan owned by Holtzbrinck S&S does seem to be the likely target if Amazon does choose to go this way.
darryl is offline   Reply With Quote