Thread: LRF output
View Single Post
Old 02-24-2009, 01:59 AM   #797
kovidgoyal
creator of calibre
kovidgoyal ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.kovidgoyal ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.kovidgoyal ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.kovidgoyal ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.kovidgoyal ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.kovidgoyal ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.kovidgoyal ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.kovidgoyal ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.kovidgoyal ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.kovidgoyal ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.kovidgoyal ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
kovidgoyal's Avatar
 
Posts: 45,386
Karma: 27756918
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Mumbai, India
Device: Various
Quote:
Originally Posted by pepak View Post
Still, wouldn't it make sense to update the LRF engine to the current framework? I was under the impression that the converters are written in such a way as to make it quite easy to add new formats - is there anything that prevents LRF from being considered a new format? Other than the time you are willing to spend on such efforts, obviously. (I would be happy to write the converter myself, but unfortunately Python is completely unknown to me.)
There's no fundamental reason the LRF engine can't be rewritten, I just prefer to spend my time on other things.
kovidgoyal is offline   Reply With Quote