View Single Post
Old 02-09-2018, 02:57 AM   #13
Antinoos
Groupie
Antinoos rocks like Gibraltar!Antinoos rocks like Gibraltar!Antinoos rocks like Gibraltar!Antinoos rocks like Gibraltar!Antinoos rocks like Gibraltar!Antinoos rocks like Gibraltar!Antinoos rocks like Gibraltar!Antinoos rocks like Gibraltar!Antinoos rocks like Gibraltar!Antinoos rocks like Gibraltar!Antinoos rocks like Gibraltar!
 
Antinoos's Avatar
 
Posts: 168
Karma: 100329
Join Date: Apr 2017
Location: Leipzig/Germany
Device: PW3, KT3 (fw 5.8.11 with jb)
Quote:
Originally Posted by knc1 View Post
ONE MORE TIME! ...
It is NOT the version number which is significant!!!

The significant difference is that between a "for factory, production line, testing ONLY firmware image and that which is (normally) released to the customer.
(It even says that several places in the file by none other than the author Amazon/Lab126)
Dammit, I've stupidly thrown away that scrap of paper where I wrote down the 10-digit build number in brackets after the firware version. But I remember definitely that there was a small difference between the "out-of-the-box 5.8.9.0.1" on the two PW3 I've jailbroken a month ago, and the build number in the "5.8.9.0.1" initial factory build. Interestingly, not in the last digits, but in the middle of this long number instead. If I remember it correctly: in one variant there was a "7", while in the other the same digit was "8". But all other digits were the same...

I propose that we should be more detailed when mentioning a "firmware version". This should always include the build number. E.g. the user fw I'm using right now is "5.8.11 (3243020037)"
Antinoos is offline   Reply With Quote