Quote:
Originally Posted by DiapDealer
Here's what you're failing to understand: I disagree. By definition, anyone who used such views to justify the subjugation of "inferior" races could not possibly have been people of conscience. Thinking you have moral justification, or a right to subjugate anyone you deem an inferior race automatically disqualifies you from being a person of conscience.
|
Don’t you think that’s rather a circular argument? Every person of conscience agrees with you, but you’re defining a “person of conscience” as being someone who
does agree with you. That doesn’t really get us anywhere!