View Single Post
Old 02-05-2018, 01:31 PM   #145
DNSB
Bibliophagist
DNSB ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DNSB ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DNSB ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DNSB ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DNSB ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DNSB ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DNSB ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DNSB ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DNSB ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DNSB ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DNSB ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
DNSB's Avatar
 
Posts: 47,324
Karma: 171313058
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Vancouver
Device: Kobo Sage, Libra Colour, Lenovo M8 FHD, Paperwhite 4, Tolino epos
Quote:
Originally Posted by DiapDealer View Post
Only. by. other. racists.

Part of the problem is that I don't simply understand why such a thing needs to be said at all. What is gained by saying racism was "normal" or acceptable back then? It was neither. It was merely common.

The answer to "was Lovecraft a racist" is "yes." Not "yes, but...".
Yes, Lovecraft was racist. I haven't seen anyone here claiming the opposite. Very likely more racist that the norm for his time. However, the norm for his time was what today's average person would likely considered as extremely racist.

I do have to ask what is your basis for claiming that racism was not "normal" or acceptable by the common person at that time? Because it is not normal or acceptable today? Or because you believe it should not have been normal or acceptable at any point in history. Common -- familiar, widespread, general, ordinary.
DNSB is offline   Reply With Quote