View Single Post
Old 01-25-2018, 12:15 PM   #201
DNSB
Bibliophagist
DNSB ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DNSB ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DNSB ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DNSB ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DNSB ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DNSB ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DNSB ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DNSB ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DNSB ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DNSB ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DNSB ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
DNSB's Avatar
 
Posts: 47,308
Karma: 171313058
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Vancouver
Device: Kobo Sage, Libra Colour, Lenovo M8 FHD, Paperwhite 4, Tolino epos
Quote:
Originally Posted by ekbell View Post
Now I'm left wondering if Penny Dreadfuls would would have counted as genre books (if that term had been used back then).

I like reading falling-in-love stories. I know that good romances exist. Why is it that I can't find them (outside of older books, some fanfic and Bujold)?
I suspect Penny Dreadful would be the genre by today's standards. Another "genre" before the penny bloods was the horrid novels. At least one of which has survived to this day. Perhaps a discussion of whether or not that by today's standards, Frankenstein or The Modern Prometheus is science fiction?

As for why modern romances have issues? According to my wife, too many of the newer romances are more concerned with diving at the nearest bed, wall, floor, etc. than in developing the story of the couple. Sex is important but it's not enough to justify a HEA ending (HFN possibly).
DNSB is offline   Reply With Quote