Quote:
Originally Posted by jj2me
Except that was exactly my original point.
Wouldn't it have been easier to say the negative, "I can't find those cars" instead of sending me a link which I expected was the positive, but I could only determine was really the negative by reading the whole thing?
I've re-Googled when challenged, I've read a link given to me, both turn up nothing. Kinda a goose-chase waste to be sent off twice to find nothing that is different from my original post. Come to think of it, add that to my author annoyances gripes.
|
Theducks linked to the Supra link to show there was never a station wagon.
So you re-googled because you didn't believe the wiki.
No. It wouldn't have been. Then others would have googled. Posting a negative link does the same thing.
So are you saying that one shouldn't post links showing something doesn't exist. Only the positives?
I appreciated the link.
We read the posting of the link two different ways.
I saw it as here iseverything about the Supra so no one else has to google.
So it wasn't a goose chase.
If I post a link, I will make sure to post exactly why so everyone knows exactly what I am talking about and no one can come back with that doesn't show a non-existent item.