Quote:
Originally Posted by mdp
This is the best I could get - unfortunately the camera is not good enough so I could not get adequate sharpness for the Max2. But it does suggest the blocky inferno of the untreated MaxCarta (which is in fact more - if you have good eyes). And, although not having achieved the reliability of a fully attentive Galileo's saggiatore, the picture may give a good idea of the differences.
The Max2 looks a bit washed out, but it may be a defect of my camera. The MaxCarta looks more contrasted, but those blocks can get very disturbing - the Max2 softens the rendering enough.
The renderings themselves, on the logical side, are possibly identical.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by plusz
I have Max2 for a few days. At first I was disappointed that the screen is a bit grayish and so the contrast is not that high. I thought about returning but after using it a few days I cannot see any problem. I can read it in normal room conditions without any tiredness - it's not too dark, it's like reading a cheap daily newspaper. Actually in the summer it will be an advantage when I take it outdoors to read in the sunshine  |
Recently, I've compared the screen of recent e-reader with a high definition screen and touch screen with my M92 screen, maybe one of this
https://www.decitre.fr/ebook/liseuses, I suppose that it's the 'Touch HD'.
The M92 is yellowish and the resolution of the M92 is worst than the new device but has a better contrast. If the screen is yellowish for the M92, the reading is more pleasant with the other device (due to high definition) even with the touch screen that give it a 'washed' aspect.
A comparison between M92 and Max2pro will be interesting.