Quote:
Originally Posted by 4691mls
I looked in on the book club discussion about Dorothy Sayers' Whose Body, having read it in the past, but realized I'd forgotten more than I remember about the book so I didn't participate in the discussion. However, I was interested in the discussion that was raised about anti-Semitism in the book. Treatment of servants was also mentioned.
Pretty much any fiction written decades or centuries ago will have attitudes that are different from today with regard to women's rights, racism, treatment of gay people, servants, slavery, etc. Does this affect whether you will read a book written 100 or more years ago?
When I have read older books I have tended to think "well, that's they way they thought at the time" and read it anyway. If I were going to think too much about women's lives in the early 1800's I wouldn't be able to enjoy reading Jane Austen's novels, where some of the women would potentially be in financial hardship if they didn't find suitable husbands.
However, I'm sure there are plenty of books with much more egregious treatment of a particular race/class/religion/etc. and now I find myself wondering what it would take for me to not read the book.
Have you ever stopped reading a book (or refused to start, based on what you've heard about it) based on such issues?
|
Hi and interesting side note: if you read the term indentured servants, remember those were typically poor whites that someone had paid for to take somewhere else and the servant had to work off the money paid and that usually took years or decades.
In the south, you also had sharecroppers and tenant farmers. (Again usually poor whites).
A good example would be Tabacco Road or God's Little Acre by Erskine Caldwell.
There have been times, I have had to look at the copyright date.