View Single Post
Old 01-16-2018, 08:14 PM   #46
Katsunami
Grand Sorcerer
Katsunami ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Katsunami ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Katsunami ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Katsunami ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Katsunami ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Katsunami ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Katsunami ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Katsunami ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Katsunami ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Katsunami ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Katsunami ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Katsunami's Avatar
 
Posts: 6,111
Karma: 34000001
Join Date: Mar 2008
Device: KPW1, KA1
For this once, I'm agreeing with JSWolf.

If plain text is an e-book format, you can count every document containing text to be an e-book. Plain Text, doc, docx, pdf, rtf... everything.

In my view, an e-book format is a format specifically designed to be able to:

1. Allow reflowable text
2. Mimic a real book, including markup, images, front cover, and metadata such as author, title, blurb...
3. Be read on devices with varying screen sizes, mainly due to feature 1, and/or by repositioning images.

PDF: Very often missing feature 1, and thus feature 3.
Plain Text: Missing feature 2 entirely.
RTF: Missing parts of feature 2 (no images, can have comments in the text, but not all implementations support metadata AFAIK)
doc/docx: Like PDF, often misses feature 1 and/or 3.

It's true you can use files such as TXT, PDF, or RTF as e-books (and I think RTF would actually be the best here), but they were never designed with that goal in mind, and thus to me, they're not e-book formats. Using those files as e-books is the same as using Excel as a database: possible, but not as it was intended.

Last edited by Katsunami; 01-16-2018 at 08:17 PM.
Katsunami is offline   Reply With Quote