View Single Post
Old 01-10-2018, 02:20 PM   #17
BookCat
C L J
BookCat ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.BookCat ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.BookCat ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.BookCat ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.BookCat ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.BookCat ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.BookCat ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.BookCat ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.BookCat ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.BookCat ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.BookCat ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
BookCat's Avatar
 
Posts: 2,911
Karma: 21115458
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Birmingham UK
Device: Sony e-reader 505, Kindle PW2, Kindle PW3, Kobo Libra2
I agree with gmw, in fact I would go further and pare it down more. This must have a high reading index, and I feel words like 'nefarious' could easily be replaced with 'evil'. You'd be surprised how many average readers don't know what nefarious means.

There's also a sense, to me, that you're giving too much away. Personally, I dislike blurb which tells me too much about the plot. As a feminist, an animal lover, and someone with a silly sense of humour, I'm possibly you're target audience. One thing puts me off reading it: it's about dogs not cats.

The majority of female animal rescuers rescue cats, hence the saying Crazy Cat Lady. I've known many of them, and they do become a close knit society giving each other support. The only dog rescue I've known was run by a man.

As you're at the point of writing the blurb, it's probably a moot point, but it may make your book even more popular if you alter the rescue species.
BookCat is offline   Reply With Quote