View Single Post
Old 02-22-2009, 12:05 PM   #26
joobies
Addict
joobies once ate a cherry pie in a record 7 seconds.joobies once ate a cherry pie in a record 7 seconds.joobies once ate a cherry pie in a record 7 seconds.joobies once ate a cherry pie in a record 7 seconds.joobies once ate a cherry pie in a record 7 seconds.joobies once ate a cherry pie in a record 7 seconds.joobies once ate a cherry pie in a record 7 seconds.joobies once ate a cherry pie in a record 7 seconds.joobies once ate a cherry pie in a record 7 seconds.joobies once ate a cherry pie in a record 7 seconds.joobies once ate a cherry pie in a record 7 seconds.
 
joobies's Avatar
 
Posts: 234
Karma: 1856
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Midwest USA
Device: Kindle 1, Sony PRS-505
My two cents on the matter.
Shorter works for me when I feel scattered and feel the need to accomplish something quickly.
I much prefer the longer, well-written works. As the author invests so much of his/her self into the creation of the book, I also invest my time and mind into fitting into the book in some way. The characters become friends and foes I can relate to.. or abhor. When a particularly good book ends, there is almost a grieving moment.
The series idea is not of great interest to me, when the works are short. It gives the impression of a money-making scheme, rather than literature of any form.
The Outlander series is one I just discovered and seems the exception to the rule due to the page count. (I still keep thinking this whole thing is a dream sequence. If so, there will be flying books in my part of the world. I will not toss my Kindle but I will throw something.)
If I can understand the book, bigger works for me... we bond.... joobies bond.
joobies is offline   Reply With Quote