View Single Post
Old 01-01-2018, 03:34 AM   #29
DNSB
Bibliophagist
DNSB ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DNSB ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DNSB ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DNSB ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DNSB ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DNSB ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DNSB ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DNSB ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DNSB ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DNSB ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DNSB ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
DNSB's Avatar
 
Posts: 47,367
Karma: 171313058
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Vancouver
Device: Kobo Sage, Libra Colour, Lenovo M8 FHD, Paperwhite 4, Tolino epos
Quote:
Originally Posted by BetterRed View Post
14 of the 302 installers in my software locker have 'x86' in their name, one of which is 'HandBrake-1.0.7-x86_64-Win_GUI.exe'

Installer names are all over the place, there's not even a convention let alone a standard.

BR
Hmmm... Intel architecture compiled for 64 bit Windows. I've seen that convention used for programs written for multiple platforms and commonly in Linux distribution repositories. Browsing a local Linux repository, I found the following in use: arm, armhfp, arm64, aarch64, i386, x86_64, ppc, ppc64, ppc64le, mips, s390, s390x, ia64, sparc and sparc64. Prize for anyone who can identify all the processors. Special bonus prize to anyone who has used all of the processors.
DNSB is online now   Reply With Quote