View Single Post
Old 12-16-2017, 02:19 AM   #22
DuckieTigger
Wizard
DuckieTigger ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DuckieTigger ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DuckieTigger ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DuckieTigger ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DuckieTigger ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DuckieTigger ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DuckieTigger ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DuckieTigger ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DuckieTigger ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DuckieTigger ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DuckieTigger ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
DuckieTigger's Avatar
 
Posts: 4,764
Karma: 246906703
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: USA
Device: Oasis 3, Oasis 2, PW3, PW1, KT
Quote:
Originally Posted by robko View Post
That's not completely true. From the Kobo Aura One specs: "IPX8 rating. Waterproof for up to 60 minutes in up to 2 metres of water." Note that it is water PROOF rather than water RESISTANT as the watch you mentioned in a later post is. The H2O did quite have as high water proof rating, but it did have a setting for the IR touch on the screen so that water droplets on the screen didn't cause issues.
If you want to believe the hype of an advertisement. IPX8 is merely protection against submersion, certified to a specific depth and time which can vary and needs to be disclosed for it to be meaningful. Oasis 2, Aura One, new H2O are all the same 2 meter 60 minutes. That is just that - take device, dunk it under water that deep and long under specific conditions, and it needs to still function afterwards.

At first glance the "lesser" rating the old H2O had with IP67 appears to be less protection against elements, but not necessary. IP67 also needs to protect against submersion (true only has to be tested for 1 meter 30 min), but is dust tight on top of that.

Going from IP67 to IPX8 in Kobo's case is a step in the wrong direction, IMO. They should have gone to IP68 to retain protection against dust.
DuckieTigger is offline   Reply With Quote