View Single Post
Old 12-04-2017, 10:29 AM   #93
astrangerhere
Professor of Law
astrangerhere ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.astrangerhere ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.astrangerhere ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.astrangerhere ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.astrangerhere ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.astrangerhere ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.astrangerhere ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.astrangerhere ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.astrangerhere ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.astrangerhere ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.astrangerhere ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
astrangerhere's Avatar
 
Posts: 3,755
Karma: 68428716
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Chapel Hill, NC
Device: Kobo Elipsa, Kobo Libra H20, Kobo Aura One, KoboMini
Quote:
Originally Posted by JSWolf View Post
Could we have an amendment to that one year rule based on price? So if it's cheap enough (we'd have to decide what price is cheap enough), it's OK to nominate.
I understand this in principle, but I am not sure it would work in practice for our international readers. For example, Joan Didion's book Slouching Towards Bethlehem is currently $1.99 in the US Amazon store, but £8.49 in the UK store. Also, something might be super cheap on Amazon, but not on Kobo. That would wipe out that lower price for someone like me who does not use Amazon. It is a really good idea, but I am just not sure how we could make it work.

I think the 1+ year shelf life ensures the broadest readership as it is more likely someone can obtain it from a library if they don't want to pay for it. I think a combination of an upper price limit and the year incubation period will help us get the highest possible participation.
astrangerhere is offline   Reply With Quote