View Single Post
Old 12-01-2017, 04:41 AM   #10
MikeB1972
Gnu
MikeB1972 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.MikeB1972 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.MikeB1972 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.MikeB1972 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.MikeB1972 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.MikeB1972 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.MikeB1972 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.MikeB1972 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.MikeB1972 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.MikeB1972 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.MikeB1972 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Posts: 1,222
Karma: 15625359
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: UK
Device: BeBook,JetBook Lite,PRS-300-350-505-650,+ran out of space to type
Quote:
Originally Posted by HarryT View Post
It is the catch-all torture, but my Latin dictionary notes that the verb "crucio" derives from the noun "crux" (cross), so it would appear that crucifixion is at least a closely-related idea.

"crucifigo" seems to be a Late/Vulgar Latin word - it's not in my classical Latin dictionary.

"(ex)crucio" is of course the origin of the English "excruciating" (as well as the "cruciatus" curse in Harry Potter ).
Well, looks like I may be using trendy Latin then with these new-fangled words
So, looks like it started as crucify, became a catch-all and then needed a variant to refer specifically to the cross then

What does your classical dictionary say about tortura?
I think it started out as specifically torture used to compel a response (as opposed to just cause torment).

Edit : Looks like it comes from the old french for twist.

Last edited by MikeB1972; 12-01-2017 at 04:43 AM. Reason: Looked it up.
MikeB1972 is offline   Reply With Quote