View Single Post
Old 11-30-2017, 04:44 AM   #322
MikeB1972
Gnu
MikeB1972 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.MikeB1972 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.MikeB1972 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.MikeB1972 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.MikeB1972 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.MikeB1972 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.MikeB1972 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.MikeB1972 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.MikeB1972 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.MikeB1972 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.MikeB1972 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Posts: 1,222
Karma: 15625359
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: UK
Device: BeBook,JetBook Lite,PRS-300-350-505-650,+ran out of space to type
Quote:
Originally Posted by DiapDealer View Post
Not at all. Just using things called definitions. The stretch is actually in calling the breaking of a rule a lie. They're simply not the same thing. It has nothing to do with rationalization (or sleeping well which has never been an issue). It has to do with using the correct term for things. Lying is lying, stealing is stealing, and breaking a rule is breaking a rule.
In that case, you can use the same argument for geo-restrictions though, people use a VPN to ignore the part of the contract they don't agree with in the same way you strip the DRM, no actual lying is involved as they have never been specifically asked if they are using a VPN.

So bypassing geo-restrictions is just breaking a rule, not lying
MikeB1972 is offline   Reply With Quote