View Single Post
Old 11-28-2017, 05:34 PM   #75
CRussel
(he/him/his)
CRussel ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.CRussel ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.CRussel ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.CRussel ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.CRussel ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.CRussel ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.CRussel ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.CRussel ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.CRussel ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.CRussel ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.CRussel ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
CRussel's Avatar
 
Posts: 12,296
Karma: 80074820
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Sunshine Coast, BC
Device: Oasis (Gen3),Paperwhite (Gen10), Voyage, Paperwhite(orig), iPad Air M3
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bookworm_Girl
I think that leapfrogging is an interesting proposal that would help address library availability and personal time constraints. If that is the path forward, then I would recommend you start the discussion on the 1st of the month and not the 20th but encourage people to chime in at any time that month.
I would agree with the first of the month if we do this. It also makes it easy to remember.

As for early discussions? I was actually one of the promoters of it (though not the originator), and I found it simply didn't work for my own participation. I work better with a deadline, and that's been true my whole life. Apparently, the participants in the MR club did too, because what we ended up was a sharp decline in the discussion after we tried it. To balance that out, and address some of your concerns, what HAS happened in the MR club is that the voting discussion thread appears to get used for some of those pre-discussion discussions. We don't close the voting and nomination threads off, so people have used them for that. Seems to work well.
CRussel is offline   Reply With Quote