View Single Post
Old 11-22-2017, 10:25 AM   #24
HarryT
eBook Enthusiast
HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
HarryT's Avatar
 
Posts: 85,557
Karma: 93980341
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: UK
Device: Kindle Oasis 2, iPad Pro 10.5", iPhone 6
Quote:
Originally Posted by crich70 View Post
I just think that once we know what a philosopher (like Aristotle or Plato) thinks about a given topic we should go on to ask 'why' they think that way about the topic. Otherwise we risk taking a given text at face value only.
I understand what you're saying, but I'd suggest that an author who espouses a view without making an argument in support of it is not actually writing philosophy at all. Argumentation is essentially what philosophy is.
HarryT is offline   Reply With Quote