View Single Post
Old 11-08-2017, 05:20 AM   #119
MikeB1972
Gnu
MikeB1972 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.MikeB1972 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.MikeB1972 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.MikeB1972 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.MikeB1972 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.MikeB1972 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.MikeB1972 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.MikeB1972 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.MikeB1972 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.MikeB1972 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.MikeB1972 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Posts: 1,222
Karma: 15625359
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: UK
Device: BeBook,JetBook Lite,PRS-300-350-505-650,+ran out of space to type
Quote:
Originally Posted by rixte View Post
I still think the Maggie S. argument is 100% flawed and doesn't prove what she thinks it proves.
Why, TBH it's the best comparison study I've seen.

Book 2 - Control, sales for paper & ebook should drop off from this

Book 3 - Released as normal
- paper sales similar to book 2
- ebook sales 50% of book 2
Book 4 - Actively tried anti-piracy measures
- Paper book sold out (only a 50% print run based on sales of book 3), reprinted
- ebook sales back to previous levels

Sure, some of those additional ebook sales could have been from people who wanted the paper book and hard numbers or at least a % split paper/ebook would be helpful, but it seems to have a better control method than any other study I've seen.

But I don't get your reasoning for 100% flawed?
MikeB1972 is offline   Reply With Quote