|
I don't think so. To my mind (at least) it is the openness which defines the act of civil disobedience.
I'm afraid that I don't see what you're trying to accomplish by this. Its only impact is going to be to increase the sale of DRM-protected eBooks - is that what you want? The only way to take a stance against DRM is to refuse to buy such books. DRM circumvention does nothing to harm publishers who use DRM, and isn't that what your ultimate goal is?
|